Hi Kevin,
OK, you asked a lot of questions about my setup and equipment. I'll do my best to answer them. First I have a question for you. Why was the gear pitch (slant) changed if not to reduce the downward pressure on the pinion support bearing? I believe another team member stated in this thread that this was the reason the slant angle was changed. Also, I've read this explanation elsewhere on a couple of occasions.
OK, while I'm awaiting your answer on this question, I'll try to answer your questions. I have FOUR flying Synergy E7s. Two have the metal side braces and two do not. I have had this problem on three of the four ships. The fourth ship has never been apart. It is my reserve and only has a couple dozen flights on it. The problem occurred on both with metal side braces and one ship without the side braces.
As far as alignment of the motor goes. I did my best. You are kind of limited with motor/pinion parallelism adjustment due to the fact that the frame holes are slotted for fore-aft adjustment but NOT for cant. Surely the metal side braces should help motor pinion support alignment but if you have a method for vertical alignment, I'm interested to hear about it.
Gear mesh was set by feel. Just the slightest play on the high side of the main gear. I did replace the pinion support bearings, of course, after noting the worn pinion face and aluminum impacted bearing tops. I do know the pinions did not slip down on the motor shaft since the indentations from the set screw on the motor shafts were perfectly round without any sign of a smear. The main gear off the Quantum motor setup, which had a lot of miles on it and was quite worn had an even wear pattern. Nothing to suggest that the pinion was not sitting square on the gear. I have already thrown it away, so no photo available.
Believe it or not, none of these ships have been crashed. I fly 3 to 5 times a week and I'm on a long winning streak as far as crashes go. Although, having stated that, I'm pretty sure I will crash this week...Lol. I am an RC pilot of 15 years rotary wing experience and I can fly my ships in any direction including pirouetting circuits in any orientation or direction. I'd call my flying style slow easy 3D. I do not fly smack or hard 3D. So, I am a heavy user but not 'hard' on my ships. I am a formally trained gunsmith so I have plenty of experience with small mechanical stuff, including the 15 years of RC heli hobby going back to Kyosho Concept 30 and 60 and Shuttle ZX. Not bragging just letting you know this is not my first rodeo on any front.
I don't believe I ever stated that the original gear train was defective or flawed? Did I infer that it was made better when I used the term redesign? I think that would be a more accurate way to describe the intent of my comments. I am grateful that the change in gear slant was implemented. I am looking forward to seeing how the new gears work out. I also stated in a previous post in this thread that my E7 was my 'all time favorite heli'. This thread was not meant to be a criticism, complaint or rant. I was just trying to find out why this was happening. I did get some good ideas and help. Thanks again to 4cyclic and RichH for the useful suggestions. At least one other person in this thread has had similar problems. So, this is not JUST my private issue.
I don't see any value in taking a bunch of pictures. If there was a problem in my installations I'm pretty sure it would be nearly impossible to see with a photograph. How could you measure tolerances or parallelism in a photograph? I did the best I could with what I had to work with. If there is no obvious previously seen common installation mistake that causes this issue that someone can put forward, then I'm at a loss to understand what happened. Unless...it just goes away with my new style gears....