November 21, 2024, 05:13:14 PM

Author Topic: HV set up verses LV set up  (Read 8452 times)

Offline Greg Jackson

  • Field Representative
  • Synergy Hero
  • ****
  • Posts: 1493
    • inner3.com
HV set up verses LV set up
« on: December 08, 2012, 10:10:30 PM »
Would the only difference be the servos?  Many have said I won't need to run HV on the 6s setup, but making sure my plans are on the right path.  Going to run Vbar, so which servos for a non HV set up?  I thought I was going with the CC 120hv, but maybe I can go with the 100 and a bec pro.  What else should I be aware of with the differences between a low voltage and high voltage setup?  This will be my first build larger then a 450 so I'm still learning new things as far as set-ups.  The motor is a scorpion HK4020-1100 and that's all I have so far.  Haven't picked servos yet, still debating on that topic.
Thanks!
Greg
Synergy & Rail Field Representative
Team Scorpion||Team BK Servos||Team Pulse|

www.inner3.com

Offline RyanW

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 162
Re: HV set up verses LV set up
« Reply #1 on: December 08, 2012, 11:50:41 PM »
Hello,
  The HV vs LV is in the ESC and batteries used for the power system. The "standard" definition of an HV set up is 6s or below. HV (in terms of ESCs) are anything above 6s. When talking about power systems, it doesn't have anything to do with servos in the terms of an HV or LV set up.

  If you are only going to go with 6s on the E5 (I say only because some are going 8, 10 and 12s), then you only need a LV ESC. If you ever decided to try something more than 6s, then you will have to buy a different ESC that is capable of higher cell count. Typically HV ESCs handle up to 12s. There are some on the market that will go to 14 and 16s.

  Back to servos.... there isn't a clear definition of what is HV on servos. Straight voltage from a 2s Li-Po is definitely HV, but in some instances 6v is also HV. If a servo is labelled "HV", it will usually be good to 8.4v. It used to be 6v defined HV on servos, but it appears that many of the standard or "LV" servos are safe to 6v. You have to confirm this before making the assumption it is okay to run 6v.

I personally don't like the feel of straight voltage, as it changes throughout a flight. I like 6v or even lower 5.6v for the servos. I use the Kontronik ESCs and they have a great built in BEC that I use. The CC BEC PRO has also been a good alternative for quite a few people. I have used it on my E7 for the past year. There really isn't a need to go with HV servos unless you want to spend the extra money and run it off of a straight Li-Po (which you most likely won't be doing on an E5).

-Ryan

Offline RichL

  • Synergy Veteran
  • *
  • Posts: 802
Re: HV set up verses LV set up
« Reply #2 on: December 09, 2012, 12:54:35 AM »
Would the only difference be the servos?  Many have said I won't need to run HV on the 6s setup, but making sure my plans are on the right path.  Going to run Vbar, so which servos for a non HV set up?  I thought I was going with the CC 120hv, but maybe I can go with the 100 and a bec pro.  What else should I be aware of with the differences between a low voltage and high voltage setup?  This will be my first build larger then a 450 so I'm still learning new things as far as set-ups.  The motor is a scorpion HK4020-1100 and that's all I have so far.  Haven't picked servos yet, still debating on that topic.
Thanks!
Greg

Greg, I think you are confusing a couple of topics here.  I'll attempt to help you sort them.  Low or high voltage servos have nothing to do with "standard" or high voltage ESCs.

Servos:
 Most "low voltage" or normal servos operate in a voltage range from 4.8 to 6 volts (in truth a 5 cell NiCd fully charged is near 7V, which is what a 6V servo was originally designed to operate from).  Servos being termed as high voltage servos typically operate between 6V to 7.4V.  The idea being that they can operate off of a 2 cell LiPo battery which fully charged is actually 8.4V.  Typically servo transit speeds and torque increase as voltage increases.  An example of this is the JR 8717s that I run in both my E7 and E5 on the collective.  At 4.8V the transit speed is 0.09 sec/60° and torque is 160 oz / inch.  At 6.0V the transit speed is 0.07 sec/60° and torque is 196 oz / inch.  As you can see the speed and torque increases with the increase of voltage. The other component that is mostly over looked when talking about RC electronics is current.  Ohms Law states that as voltage increases current decreases.  Why is this important to you?  Because higher current equals more heat and heat is the number one cause of electronic failure period (Yes, i know there is a caveat frequency)!  So by increasing the voltage on the servos you can increase speed and torque and reduce heat.  I run a Futaba BLS256HV on the tail of both of my Synergy's.  But .... that is a high voltage servo why would I do such a thing?  Because the Futaba BLS256HV has a voltage range of 6V to 7.4V (actually 8.4V) and allows me to operate my collective servos at there maximum speed.  Having fast collective servos translates into a responsive crisp feeling.  In truth I operate all of my electronics at 6.9 volts.  (I'm not advocating that you do this as it is outside the voltage range specified by JR for the 8717s but, the JR8717 is a tried and tested servo and it operates fine at 6.9V). This is what you need to know.  First the performance of a flybarless helicopter is going to be no better than the servos on the collective.  If you use slow servos your helicopter is going to feel sluggish.  No flybarless system can compensate for slow servos or for servos that don't center correctly (sloppy).  Another thing to consider is that all three collective servos must move at the same speed.  Lets say that you have three of the exact same servos on the collective but one is a little slower than the other two (for what ever reason lets say quality control (China)).  In this scenario if you raised the collective stick rapidly the helicopter is going to pitch in the direction of the slower servo (the FBL unit will reduce some of this but can not eliminate it).  This is the same reason that typically when you replace and aging servo on the collective you replace all three.  Generally an old servo is not going to be as fast or precise as a new servo.  I had a discussion with Matt recently about tail servos.  Matt said that most of the tail related problems he sees are related directly to tail servo. Aside from speed and torque when selecting a tail servo there are a couple of other things to consider.  Resolution and deadband.  Deadband reflects the time it takes for a servo to respond when stick movement is given.  Standard servos have a deadband of around 8 micro seconds and high performance servos have a deadband of 1~3 micro seconds (Zero dead band is ideal for a tail servo because the tail gyro is making constant corrections to hold tail orientation and compensate for torque).  Resolution, without getting into a long technical definition is how small a movement your servo can make. Resolution is effected by frequency and pulse width.  Here is an example.  I was flying a JR 8900G on the tail of my E7.  The JR 8900g was 5 thousands of a second faster than the Futaba BLS256HV that I'm currently using but lacked the resolution therefor the tail of my E7 didn't feel as solid or as responsive as it does now.  And last but, not least keep your tail servo voltage in mind.  Things are greatly simplified when all of your electronics can operate at the same voltage eliminating extra components like voltage regulators (or step downs as they are commonly referred to).   The bottom line is if I were looking for a place to save money it would not be on servos.  Buy the best servos you can afford.  Your helicopter will reward you with hundreds of trouble free connected feeling flights.  This link is a good resource for looking up servo specs.  http://www.servodatabase.com

Bec:

Digital servos are power hungry, some more that others.  This is why most helicopter pilots do not run ESCs with built in BECs.  Simply stated most ESCs with built in BECs cannot supply enough current to supply four digital servos under load.  For instance you mentioned a "Castle 100" in the above text (and a CC BEC Pro to your credit).  The Castle Phoenix 100 has a built in BEC with a maximum current of 5 amps.  A single JR 8717 under load can draw up to 2.2 amps. A total of 6.6 amps for the collective alone and we still haven't powered the tail servo, Vbar or receivers.  I think you can see where I'm going with this.  The Castle Creations BEC Pro can deliver 20 amps peak and would be a good choice.  I'm sure others will chime in with other options.

ESC:
The primary difference between a standard ESC and a high voltage ESC is the number of cells that can be connected to them.  Standard voltage ESCs generally support up to 6S where most HV ESCs support up to 12S.  I stayed with the CC Ice2 120HV because it gives me more options.  If I decide to stretch my E5 later I don't have to buy another ESC to run 12S.  On the flip side of that coin I have run my HV ESC on 3S.  Maximum flexibility!  Also remember that a ESC that is rated for a higher current can dissipate more heat than one rated for a lower current and will therefor run cooler and should last longer.

I hope this helps.  There are a lot of people out there confused about this stuff so don't feel like the Lone Ranger.  In the beginning it's like trying to get a drink of water from a fire hose without getting wet.

Rich 
« Last Edit: December 12, 2012, 01:04:28 AM by RichL »
Synergy E5: Scorpion HKIII 4025-1100, CC ICE2 120HV, Rail 556/96, V-Bar Silverline

Synergy E7: Quantum 4530-500, CC ICE2 160HV, Rail 716/116, V-Bar Silverline

Offline RichL

  • Synergy Veteran
  • *
  • Posts: 802
Re: HV set up verses LV set up
« Reply #3 on: December 09, 2012, 12:57:03 AM »
Hello,
  The HV vs LV is in the ESC and batteries used for the power system. The "standard" definition of an HV set up is 6s or below. HV (in terms of ESCs) are anything above 6s. When talking about power systems, it doesn't have anything to do with servos in the terms of an HV or LV set up.

  If you are only going to go with 6s on the E5 (I say only because some are going 8, 10 and 12s), then you only need a LV ESC. If you ever decided to try something more than 6s, then you will have to buy a different ESC that is capable of higher cell count. Typically HV ESCs handle up to 12s. There are some on the market that will go to 14 and 16s.

  Back to servos.... there isn't a clear definition of what is HV on servos. Straight voltage from a 2s Li-Po is definitely HV, but in some instances 6v is also HV. If a servo is labelled "HV", it will usually be good to 8.4v. It used to be 6v defined HV on servos, but it appears that many of the standard or "LV" servos are safe to 6v. You have to confirm this before making the assumption it is okay to run 6v.

I personally don't like the feel of straight voltage, as it changes throughout a flight. I like 6v or even lower 5.6v for the servos. I use the Kontronik ESCs and they have a great built in BEC that I use. The CC BEC PRO has also been a good alternative for quite a few people. I have used it on my E7 for the past year. There really isn't a need to go with HV servos unless you want to spend the extra money and run it off of a straight Li-Po (which you most likely won't be doing on an E5).

Ryan, you were faster than by me by 4 min but, I had already written a book so I had to post it.  LOL
« Last Edit: December 09, 2012, 01:29:19 AM by RichL »
Synergy E5: Scorpion HKIII 4025-1100, CC ICE2 120HV, Rail 556/96, V-Bar Silverline

Synergy E7: Quantum 4530-500, CC ICE2 160HV, Rail 716/116, V-Bar Silverline

Offline Greg Jackson

  • Field Representative
  • Synergy Hero
  • ****
  • Posts: 1493
    • inner3.com
Re: HV set up verses LV set up
« Reply #4 on: December 09, 2012, 10:40:30 AM »
Wow, thanks for the great info.  I will read this over and over a few times to make sure I completely get it.  So that means I can run the 256 on the tail with maybe the 451 on cyclic?  Or should I go for an even faster servo?  Unfortunately the 255s add up to be a little more than I can do for now.  Also, will the CC100 be fine with the BEC Pro or Super Hercules?  I won't ever put this heli on 12s so don't need to worry about future stretching. 
Thanks!
Greg
Synergy & Rail Field Representative
Team Scorpion||Team BK Servos||Team Pulse|

www.inner3.com

Offline RyanW

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 162
Re: HV set up verses LV set up
« Reply #5 on: December 09, 2012, 11:09:54 AM »
You know, some say the BLS451 isn't optimal for helicopters and FBL applications, but they do work very well. Sure, the BLS255 would be the best, but I have the BLS451 in the N5C and they perform very well. I also use the BLS251 on the tail for both the N5C and the E7. I am a die-hard JR guy, but I believe the Futaba tail servos are hands down the best. The Futaba cyclic servos are growing on me since they don't seem to develop slop like the JR servos do.

I think you will be fine with the BEC Pro and the CC. If you need one, PM me. I have my CC120HV ICE2 ESC and BEC Pro out of my E7 that I am not doing anything with.

-Ryan
-Ryan

Offline Greg Jackson

  • Field Representative
  • Synergy Hero
  • ****
  • Posts: 1493
    • inner3.com
Re: HV set up verses LV set up
« Reply #6 on: December 09, 2012, 01:44:03 PM »
I may contact you.  Reading up on the Jive 100 now.
Synergy & Rail Field Representative
Team Scorpion||Team BK Servos||Team Pulse|

www.inner3.com

Offline RyanW

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 162
Re: HV set up verses LV set up
« Reply #7 on: December 09, 2012, 02:27:34 PM »
I am going with the Jive 100LV on my E5. I have found the built in BEC to be the only one I trust in any ESC. I keep it at the factory 5.6v and haven't had an issue in all the years I have used the Jives.
-Ryan

Offline JeepCJ

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 117
HV set up verses LV set up
« Reply #8 on: December 09, 2012, 02:35:38 PM »
I'm running the Jive 100 LV on the E5
 Has heatsink on it, and is working great! 

Bob
Bob Fisk
Team Synergy
Central NY

Offline RichL

  • Synergy Veteran
  • *
  • Posts: 802
Re: HV set up verses LV set up
« Reply #9 on: December 09, 2012, 06:50:44 PM »
I'm running the Jive 100 LV on the E5
 Has heatsink on it, and is working great! 

Bob

Bob or Ryan, does the Jive include any documentation that states how long the BEC can sustain it's maximum current rating of 15 Amps?  In the BEC specs below, the Jive 100 has a continuous current of 5A.  I'm just curious.  I have heard nothing but rave reviews for the Kontronic ESCs but, the math doesn't work on the BEC side with a continuous current of only 5A especially for a helicopter with four digital servos, radio receivers and a FBL unit. If the Jive 100 has a log of the output current on the BEC side I would love to see it's output log during a actual flight.

Jive 100  BEC Specs:
- BEC current continuous: 5A
- BEC current max.: 15A
- BEC voltage: 5,5V
- BEC adjustable with ProgCARD: 5-6V
- BEC short circuit protection

Rich
« Last Edit: December 09, 2012, 06:53:30 PM by RichL »
Synergy E5: Scorpion HKIII 4025-1100, CC ICE2 120HV, Rail 556/96, V-Bar Silverline

Synergy E7: Quantum 4530-500, CC ICE2 160HV, Rail 716/116, V-Bar Silverline

Offline RyanW

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 162
Re: HV set up verses LV set up
« Reply #10 on: December 09, 2012, 07:13:22 PM »
Hello Rich and others....

   I don't have graphs or data logs, but from my experience and what I have heard from those who have done testing is the Jive BEC is very underrated. Sticking with the 5.6v output seems to make these bulletproof. I haven't heard anything really bad about going higher voltage, just that 5.6v can handle about anything.

   As for the exact ratings... I have found "15A Constant" BECs fail where the Kontronik keeps going. Same with the 80HV ESC. I know these have been overloaded by many with no issues.
-Ryan

Offline Chris Sexton

  • Factory Specialist
  • Synergy Hero
  • *****
  • Posts: 2729
  • Admiral, There be whales here!
HV set up verses LV set up
« Reply #11 on: December 09, 2012, 07:19:37 PM »
I can second this. I have never had a jive bec fail and I know quiet a few people with jive becs. None of them have ever reported a problem with a jive bec failing.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Chris Sexton
Synergy Factory Specialist / Rail Blades / Team Scorpion

Offline RichL

  • Synergy Veteran
  • *
  • Posts: 802
Re: HV set up verses LV set up
« Reply #12 on: December 09, 2012, 07:21:36 PM »
Hello Rich and others....

   I don't have graphs or data logs, but from my experience and what I have heard from those who have done testing is the Jive BEC is very underrated. Sticking with the 5.6v output seems to make these bulletproof. I haven't heard anything really bad about going higher voltage, just that 5.6v can handle about anything.

   As for the exact ratings... I have found "15A Constant" BECs fail where the Kontronik keeps going. Same with the 80HV ESC. I know these have been overloaded by many with no issues.

Ryan, thanks for the reply.  Great to know.

Rich
Synergy E5: Scorpion HKIII 4025-1100, CC ICE2 120HV, Rail 556/96, V-Bar Silverline

Synergy E7: Quantum 4530-500, CC ICE2 160HV, Rail 716/116, V-Bar Silverline

Offline GimpyGolden

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 26
Re: HV set up verses LV set up
« Reply #13 on: December 10, 2012, 08:16:53 AM »
On my 7Hv w/ Jive 120 I have logged (JLog2) BEC average current of 7-8A running BLS451/252 combo. Never had a Jive BEC miss a beat either and I've logged over 2000 flights combined on my Jive equipped machines.
RCHeliCanada.com Field Rep

Offline Greg Jackson

  • Field Representative
  • Synergy Hero
  • ****
  • Posts: 1493
    • inner3.com
Re: HV set up verses LV set up
« Reply #14 on: December 10, 2012, 11:02:22 AM »
That really makes me feel confident in buying a Jive, I don't want to have major problems on this heli, even though something else could potentially be an issue. 
Synergy & Rail Field Representative
Team Scorpion||Team BK Servos||Team Pulse|

www.inner3.com