November 22, 2024, 10:25:46 AM

Author Topic: E7SE: How optimal is the head geometry for the VBar?  (Read 5741 times)

Offline Enrique Perez

  • Member
  • **
  • Posts: 95
Re: E7SE: How optimal is the head geometry for the VBar?
« Reply #15 on: August 14, 2013, 07:50:33 PM »
Great flight Enrique  and thank you for posting up your Vbar files , will make life easy setting her up,

wow very fast tail, i usually sit around 80 with mine or it gets too scary for me  :)

BTW  is the verification process active for every post or just the 1st few ?

Your welcome. Its only fast if you peg the rudder stick ;D Thanks!!
Can't remember how many post before it stops verification but but think it was less than 5. 
« Last Edit: August 14, 2013, 07:52:26 PM by eperez74 »
Enrique Perez
Team Synergy

Offline Chris Wall

  • Field Representative
  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 221
    • WallsWorld
Re: E7SE: How optimal is the head geometry for the VBar?
« Reply #16 on: October 05, 2013, 09:24:33 AM »
Enrique,
First awesome flight!  I noticed you are running 116 tails in the video at 2100, are you running the 12 tooth spur gear or the default 11T?  I was thinking of running the 696/116 combo, but didn't change out the default tail ratio when building...
Synergy Field Representative / Team Scorpion / Team FBL Rotors
www.fortbendhelis.com

Offline Enrique Perez

  • Member
  • **
  • Posts: 95
Re: E7SE: How optimal is the head geometry for the VBar?
« Reply #17 on: October 05, 2013, 12:35:15 PM »
Thanks for the complement!! I run the stock gear gearing that ships with the SE kit 11T (4.9:1).  I have not had any issues with 696/116 but per the manual it recommends the following.

2000 and up - 96-106mm Tail Blades
1950 and lower - 106-116mm Tail Blades

I have dropped my HS  recently to 2050 since it felt better to me after some fine tuning (more head room for vbar gov).
« Last Edit: October 05, 2013, 12:38:23 PM by eperez74 »
Enrique Perez
Team Synergy